Deepen your insights

Election interference

Hybrid CoE Research Report 12: Countering hybrid threats to elections: From updating legislation to establishing collaboration networks

Hybrid CoE Working Paper 29: Cause for concern: The continuing success and impact of Kremlin disinformation campaigns

Hybrid CoE Research Report 11: How Ukraine fights Russian disinformation: Beehive vs mammoth

Attribution of information influence operations is broken – this is how to fix it, suggests a new publication by NATO StratCom COE and Hybrid CoE

Hybrid CoE Paper 12: Deterring hybrid threats: Towards a fifth wave of deterrence theory and practice

Hybrid CoE Working Paper 13: The Kremlin’s messaging on Ukraine: Authorities and “media” hand in hand

Hybrid CoE Strategic Analysis 30: Russia’s policy towards Belarus: Controlling more, giving back less

Hybrid CoE Working Paper 11: Disinformation 2.0: Trends for 2021 and beyond

Hybrid CoE Research Report 2: Effective state practices against disinformation: Four country case studies

Non-state actors as state proxies: A new Hybrid Coe Research Report looks at the situation in China

Hybrid CoE Research Report 1: China as a hybrid influencer: Non-state actors as state proxies

Hybrid CoE Paper 5: Improving cooperation with social media companies to counter electoral interference

Non-state actors

Hybrid CoE Strategic Analysis 15: How states use non-state actors. A modus operandi for covert state subversion and malign networks

Hybrid CoE Paper 1: Countering disinformation: News media and legal resilience

Hybrid CoE Paper 2: DETERRENCE – Proposing a more strategic approach to countering hybrid threats

Hybrid CoE Paper 3: Tackling the bureaucratic vulnerability: an A to Z for practitioners